Effectiveness Verification of Anti-Money Laundering Measures

The Financial Services Agency (FSA) has published a draft summary of issues and practices for dialogues on verifying the effectiveness of anti-money laundering measures for public comment, due by Thursday, February 20, 2025.

The FSA emphasizes a shift towards continuous self-assessment by financial institutions, coupled with in-depth dialogue with the FSA. The draft document stresses the importance of risk-based approaches, ongoing adaptation to evolving threats, and the need for financial institutions to not only implement measures but also demonstrate their effectiveness to internal and external stakeholders. The FSA will not use the document as a checklist but rather as a foundation for dialogue.

I. Key Themes and Ideas

Importance of AML/CTF

• The document highlights the crucial role of AML/CTF measures in preventing funds from reaching criminals and terrorists, thereby protecting legitimate economic activity and public safety.
• Failure to implement robust measures can lead to financial losses (e.g., costs of responding to fraud, business interruption), reputational damage, and potentially facilitate illegal activities.

Risk-Based Approach

• The document reinforces the international standard of a risk-based approach to AML/CTF, as recommended by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). Financial institutions are expected to identify, assess, and mitigate risks tailored to their specific circumstances, including their business strategies and the external environment.

Effectiveness Verification is Crucial

• Merely establishing AML/CTF frameworks is insufficient. Financial institutions need to continuously assess the effectiveness of these measures, ensuring they are adequate in the face of evolving risks.

Risk Identification & Assessment

• This involves continuously evaluating internal and external information to identify and assess all risks. The evaluation should take into account things like suspicious activity reports.

Risk Mitigation

• Verifying whether the institution has effectively designed and implemented risk mitigation measures such as Customer Due Diligence (CDD), transaction monitoring, record keeping, suspicious activity reporting, and IT systems. These measures need to be appropriate to the degree of risk identified.

Timely Effectiveness Verification

• In addition to regular assessment, significant events like major violations or increased exploitation of services should trigger a specific review of effectiveness.

Dialogue with the FSA

• The FSA will engage in active dialogue with financial institutions to assess their risk management and verify their self-assessments.
• The FSA emphasizes that the focus will be on how well the institution demonstrates its process of continuous planning, execution, and improvement in their risk management.
• The dialogue will focus on management involvement, internal audits, risk identification, mitigation measures, and significant event responses.
• The FSA will consider the scale and characteristics of the financial institution during dialogue, and will avoid imposing excessive burdens.

Role of Management

• The document emphasizes that management is responsible for ensuring the effective implementation and continuous improvement of AML/CTF measures. They must understand the risks and be able to explain their approach.
• Management must allocate resources, establish communication frameworks across departments, and demonstrate active engagement in the process.

Continuous Improvement (PDCA Cycle)

• The document underscores that AML/CTF compliance is not a one-time event but a continuous process that requires institutions to implement the PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act) cycle, where institutions plan actions, implement those plans, check their progress and act to improve.

Transparency

• The FSA will publish its findings and raise awareness of successful initiatives. If revisions to laws or regulations are needed, the FSA will share this information with relevant departments and ministries.

II. Implications

• For Financial Institutions: This document requires financial institutions to take a more proactive approach to AML/CTF. They cannot simply implement prescribed procedures but must continuously verify the effectiveness of their measures and document the process. The ability to articulate and defend their methodology to the FSA during dialogues will also be critical.
• For the FSA: This document represents a commitment to deeper engagement with financial institutions. The FSA is shifting towards a more collaborative and less prescriptive approach, focused on evidence-based evaluation. It also stresses the necessity of an adequately trained staff that possesses strong knowledge, analytical capabilities, and communication skills.

III. Conclusion

This discussion paper emphasizes the dynamic nature of AML/CTF risks and the need for financial institutions to continuously adapt and enhance their risk management practices. It signals the FSA's intention to move away from checklist-based compliance and towards a more nuanced approach based on substantive dialogue and self-assessment. The successful implementation of these changes will rely on effective partnerships between the regulator and the regulated institutions.

Please follow us to read more about Finance & FinTech in Japan, like hundreds of readers do every day. We invite you to also register for our short weekly digest, the “Japan FinTech Observer”, on LinkedIn, or directly here on the platform.

We also provide a daily short-form Japan FinTech Observer news podcast, available via its Podcast Page. Our global Finance & FinTech Podcast, “eXponential Finance” is available through its own LinkedIn newsletter, or via its Podcast Page.

Should you live in Tokyo, or just pass through, please also join our meetup. In any case, our YouTube channel and LinkedIn page are there for you as well.